|
Headlines:
|
 |
Back to Fertility Articles
Thursday, 22nd January 2004
Submit your own articles & thesis!
|
|
|
At last gender selection is scientifically feasible. Could this become the
21st century's form of sex discrimination?
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Throughout history, humans have wished for a child of one sex or the
other. At last gender selection is scientifically feasible. The most
intriguing method is an in vitro fertilization technique called
preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Gender selection techniques
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was originally designed for
detecting genetic diseases. It allows genetic analysis to be performed
on early embryos prior to implantation and pregnancy. It was intended to
exclude genetically defective embryos before they have a chance to
develop. Typically one or both partners have been genetically screened
and found to be a carrier for a inheritable genetic disorder.
The technique of preimplantation genetic diagnosis involves the
removal of eggs from the woman and fertilization within the lab using
standard IVF (invitro fertilization) techniques to create embryos.
Embryos are then biopsied under microscopic observation and control to
obtain one or two sample cells (blastomeres) for genetic analysis using
either specialized DNA amplification or fluorescent hybridization
systems. Male and female embryos can be differentiated by examining
their chromosomes. If they spot a Y, they know it's male. After
determining the sex of embryos, doctors implant the desired ones. While
more invasive and costly (around 20,000 US Dollars) than other methods
of gender selection, the success of preimplantation genetic diagnosis is
virtually guaranteed.

|
|
|
|
Are you a doctor or a nurse?
Do you want to join the Doctors Lounge online medical community?
Participate in editorial activities (publish, peer review, edit) and
give a helping hand to the largest online community of patients.
Click on the link below to see the requirements:
Doctors Lounge Membership
Application |
|
An FDA trial involving a sophisticated sperm-sorting technology
called MicroSort is more than halfway to completion. Through an
extensive marketing campaign Genetics and IVF Institute (GIVF) were able
to recruit more and more cases each month.
This experimental technique separates girl-producing sperm, which
carry X chromosomes, from boy-producing sperm, which have Y chromosomes
using an electrode that gives X's a positive charge and Y's a negative
one. Charged plates then attract and separate X's and Y's, channeling
them into different receptacles. Either sample can now be used to
fertilize a woman's eggs, depending on the gender requested.
A third low-cost method which has been around fro decades is the
Ericsson technique. Sperm are poured on a viscous layer of fluid.
The sperm carrying Y chromosomes swim faster than sperm carrying X
chromosomes, reaching the bottom of the test tube sooner. They can then
be extracted and used for insemination. Supporters of this technique
claim an 85 percent chance of producing a boy. Critics say the odds are
no better than 50% (rendering it ineffective).
Ethical issues
If couples can request a baby boy or girl, could picking one gender
over the other become the 21st century's form of sex discrimination? Or
could this upset the ratio of males to females? These explosive issues
are undergoing heated debated in the medical circles. Preimplantation
genetic diagnosis also takes us back to the question of whether the
destruction of an embryo is equivalent to the murder of a human.
Children are going to hold their parents responsible for having made
them this way. Currently there are no laws against performing gender
selection in the United States.
|