If Colonoscopy Picks Up Cancer Risk, Get Next Screen in 5 Years: StudyLast Updated: July 25, 2012. But U.S. recommendations call for 3-year interval after high-risk polyps removed.
By Steven Reinberg
WEDNESDAY, July 25 (HealthDay News) -- People who have had a colonoscopy during which a high-risk potentially cancerous polyp was removed may not need another colonoscopy for five years, German researchers report.
If this suggestion were to be adopted, it would be a change from the current recommendation in the United States, which calls for another colonoscopy three years after a high-risk polyp -- one that is likely to become cancerous -- is removed.
"This is a case control study, so they didn't follow a group of individuals over time to assess the impact of polyp removal," said Dr. Durado Brooks, director of prostate and colorectal cancers at the American Cancer Society.
That kind of patient follow-up, however, did take place in the study that established the current U.S. recommendations for colonoscopy, he noted.
In addition, while the German study looks at the odds of cancer developing over time, the older study that set the U.S. guidelines looked at the odds of a new polyp developing, Brooks said.
"The time frames they are recommending are something that might be considered, but you cannot make changes in current guidelines based on this study," he said.
The report was published online July 23 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
For the new study, a team lead by Dr. Hermann Brenner, at the German Cancer Research Center, in Heidelberg, looked at medical records of more than 2,500 people who had a cancerous polyp removed and compared them to nearly 1,800 people without such polyps.
They compared surveillance intervals of less than three years, three to five years, and six to 10 years before receiving another colonoscopy.
Looking at the risk of finding colorectal cancer, even for those with high-risk polyps, "strong, statistically significant risk reduction by 60 percent was seen for the less-than-three-years time window and by 50 percent for the three-to-five-years time window," the researchers wrote.
This was true for men, women, young and old, they added.
Their results suggest that surveillance colonoscopy could take place five to 10 years after the a low-risk polyp was found and removed, and possibly also be prolonged to five years for high-risk polyps, the researchers concluded.
The current recommendation for people with high-risk polyps is to have another colonoscopy three years after the polyp was removed, Brooks said.
If new polyps aren't found, then another colonoscopy isn't needed for 10 years, he said.
The 10-year span between colonoscopies is the recommendation for anyone who has a normal colonoscopy, Brooks added.
The advantage of extending the time between colonoscopies from three to five years in patients with high-risk polyps is the use of resources, he said.
The problem is that doctors don't follow the current guidelines.
"If we could get clinicians just to follow the current recommendations we could expand our resources considerably," Brooks said. "Right now far too many people are getting colonoscopies done at intervals that are not recommended by anyone's guidelines."
Some people who have had high-risk polyps get a colonoscopy every year. Many people who have normal colonoscopies get another after five years, Brooks said.
All the evidence shows that colonoscopies every five years is much too frequent, he said.
"We are doing far too many colonoscopies on people who are in the system, but there are at least 40 percent of adults at risk who have never been screened," Brooks said. "If you're 50 and older and never been screened -- get screened."
For more about colon cancer, visit the American Cancer Society.
SOURCES: Durado Brooks, M.D., director, colorectal cancer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta; July 23, 2012, Journal of Clinical Oncology, online