Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Blogs  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 

 Headlines:

 

Category: Family Medicine | Gastroenterology | Infections | Internal Medicine | Emergency Medicine | Nursing | Pathology | Pediatrics | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Malaria Vaccine Does Not Protect Against Clinical Malaria

Last Updated: September 14, 2011.

 

But is strain specific for clinical malaria caused by parasites with the AMA1 DNA sequence

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
The malaria vaccine, FMP 2.1/AS02A, based on apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) from the 3D7 strain of Plasmodium falciparum does not provide significant protection against clinical malaria, but may have strain-specific efficacy against parasites with AMA1 corresponding to that of the vaccine strain, according to a study published in the Sept. 15 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

WEDNESDAY, Sept. 14 (HealthDay News) -- The malaria vaccine, FMP 2.1/AS02A, based on apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) from the 3D7 strain of Plasmodium falciparum does not provide significant protection against clinical malaria, but may have strain-specific efficacy against parasites with AMA1 corresponding to that of the vaccine strain, according to a study published in the Sept. 15 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Mahamadou A. Thera, M.D., M.P.H., from the University of Bamako in Mali, and colleagues investigated the efficacy of FMP 2.1/AS02A against clinical falciparum malaria in Malian children and sought to determine whether the efficacy was strain specific. A total of 400 Malian children were immunized with either the malaria vaccine or a control (rabies) vaccine, and followed up for six months. Clinical malaria and clinical malaria caused by parasites with the AMA1 DNA sequence found in the vaccine strain were the primary and secondary end points, respectively.

The investigators found that the cumulative incidence for the primary end point in the malaria-vaccine and control group was 48.4 and 54.4 percent, respectively, with 17.4 percent efficacy against the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; P = 0.18). The vaccine had an efficacy of approximately 20 percent against the first and subsequent episodes of clinical malaria. An efficacy of 64.3 percent was observed against clinical malaria caused by parasites with AMA1 corresponding to that of the vaccine strain (HR, 0.36). Fever after vaccination and local reactions were frequent with the malaria vaccine.

"On the basis of the primary end point, the malaria vaccine did not provide significant protection against clinical malaria, but on the basis of secondary results, it may have strain-specific efficacy," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial relationships with GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals.

Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2011 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Optic Radiation Delineated by Tractography During Surgery Next: Long-Term Nonaspirin NSAID Use Ups Renal Cell Cancer Risk

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2013
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.