Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Blogs  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 

 Headlines:

 

Category: Cardiology | Family Medicine | Geriatrics | Internal Medicine | Critical Care | Emergency Medicine | Nursing | Surgery | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

ICD Deactivation Knowledge Lacking in End-of-Life Care

Last Updated: October 11, 2011.

 

Patient, provider knowledge of implantable cardiac devices lacking, preventing timely discussion

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
Patients and providers require more knowledge about the functions of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and end-of-life options in order to facilitate timely ICD deactivation discussions, according to a review published in the October issue of the American Journal of Nursing.

TUESDAY, Oct. 11 (HealthDay News) -- Patients and providers require more knowledge about the functions of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and end-of-life options in order to facilitate timely ICD deactivation discussions, according to a review published in the October issue of the American Journal of Nursing.

James E. Russo, R.N., A.N.P., C.C.D.S., from the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in New York City, reviewed available literature from 1999 to 2010 to identify factors delaying ICD deactivation discussions, and ways of promoting these discussions for patients with ICDs. A total of 14 studies were included to examine how providers practice and manage ICD deactivation, and how providers and patients handle these discussions.

The author found that the timing of deactivation discussions were adversely affected by providers' knowledge deficits about ICD functions and their attitudes regarding deactivation in terminally ill patients. Evidence was noted that an industry representative usually performed the ICD deactivation, thereby breaking the continuity of care. Research on patients' attitudes was limited, but it appeared that patients lacked sufficient knowledge about ICD function in order to make an informed decision about deactivation. A formal institutional policy facilitated more frequent occurrence of discussions. For terminally ill patients, deactivation was more likely when discussions were held as part of an interdisciplinary approach to care.

"Both patients and providers need better knowledge of ICD functions and options at the end of life in order to foster more timely discussion of device deactivation," the authors write.

Abstract
Full Text

Copyright © 2011 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Glycemic Extremes Affect Brain Development in Type 1 Diabetes Next: Good Long-Term Outcomes With Selective Thoracic Fusion

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.