Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Blogs  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 

 Headlines:

 

Category: Family Medicine | Internal Medicine | Neurology | Nursing | Orthopedics | Rheumatology | Anesthesiology & Pain | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Ultrasound, Shock Wave Not Effective for Low Back Pain

Last Updated: October 21, 2011.

 

Available evidence shows that different treatments of acute low back pain give similar results

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
The available evidence does not support the effectiveness of ultrasound or shock wave for treating low back pain, according to a review published in the October issue of The Spine Journal.

FRIDAY, Oct. 21 (HealthDay News) -- The available evidence does not support the effectiveness of ultrasound or shock wave for treating low back pain (LBP), according to a review published in the October issue of The Spine Journal.

Jesús Seco, M.D., Ph.D., from the University of León in Ponferrada, Spain, and colleagues reviewed available literature to July 2009 to assess the evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety of ultrasound and a shock wave device in treating LBP. A total of 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vibrotherapy with placebo or with other treatments for LBP were identified, of which four complied with the inclusion criteria and included 252 patients. Additional data were obtained from authors of original studies and the risk of bias of each study was assessed using Cochrane Back Review Group criteria.

The investigators found that ultrasound, traction, and low-power laser gave similar results for acute patients with LBP and leg pain due to disc herniation. Ultrasound was less effective than spinal manipulation in chronic LBP patients without leg pain. In these patients, a shock wave device and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation produced similar results. Of the three RCTs on ultrasound, two had a high risk of bias. Only one study compared ultrasound versus a sham procedure, but results were unreliable due to inappropriate sham procedure, low sample size, and no adjustment for potential confounders.

"The available trials do not demonstrate the efficacy or effectiveness of ultrasound and shock wave for treating LBP, whether acute or chronic, with or without leg pain," the authors write.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2011 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Dopamine Polymorphisms Tied to Methylphenidate Response Next: Local LV Remodeling Linked to Mitral Regurgitation

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.