Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Opinion  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 
Category: Family Medicine | Gynecology | Internal Medicine | Nursing | Pediatrics | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Maternal and Child Health Inequalities Found Worldwide

Last Updated: March 30, 2012.

 

Country-level and intervention-level disparities seen in national surveys

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
As part of Countdown to 2015, substantial variation has been identified between countries and interventions with respect to coverage levels of maternal, neonatal, and child health interventions, according to a study published in the March 31 issue of The Lancet.

FRIDAY, March 30 (HealthDay News) -- As part of Countdown to 2015, substantial variation has been identified between countries and interventions with respect to coverage levels of maternal, neonatal, and child health interventions, according to a study published in the March 31 issue of The Lancet.

In order to continue tracking the progress toward achievement of Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5, Aluísio J.D. Barros, Ph.D., from the Federal University of Pelotas in Brazil, and colleagues reanalyzed data from 12 national surveys conducted in 54 Countdown to 2015 countries between January 2000 and December 2008. Country-level and intervention-level variations in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions were assessed.

The researchers found that the least equitable intervention was skilled birth attendant coverage, followed by four or more antenatal care visits. In contrast, early initiation of breastfeeding was the most equitable intervention. For the interventions examined, Chad, Nigeria, Somalia, Ethiopia, Laos, and Niger were the most inequitable countries, followed by Madagascar, Pakistan, and India. Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan were the most equitable countries. Interventions based in the community were more equitable than those delivered in health facilities. The variability in coverage between countries was larger for the poorest than the richest individuals, for all interventions studied.

"The Countdown to 2015 process is an excellent example of use of rigorously collected data to monitor health programs and improve health outcomes," write the authors of an accompanying editorial. "Similar data can be used across and within countries to assess disparities in care provision, which makes this process especially valuable."

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Genetic Variants Confer Susceptibility to Fatty Liver Next: HIV Superinfection Broadens Immune Response in Women

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.