Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Blogs  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 

 Headlines:

 

Category: Family Medicine | Gynecology | Nursing | Oncology | Radiology | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Mammogram Plus MRI or Ultrasound Catches More Cancer

Last Updated: April 03, 2012.

 

Increased detection in women at high risk of breast cancer, but increase also seen in false-positives

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
The addition of an ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging to annual mammography results in a higher rate of detection of incident breast cancers, according to a study published in the April 4 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

TUESDAY, April 3 (HealthDay News) -- The addition of an ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to annual mammography results in a higher rate of detection of incident breast cancers, according to a study published in the April 4 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Wendie A. Berg, M.D., Ph.D., of Magee-Womens Hospital in Pittsburgh, and colleagues followed 2,809 women with elevated cancer risk and dense breast tissue. A total of 2,662 women underwent three annual screens with mammography and ultrasound in randomized order. After three rounds of both screenings, women could choose to undergo an MRI.

The researchers found that supplemental incidence screening ultrasound identified 3.7 cancers per 1,000 screens (P < 0.001). For mammography plus ultrasound, the sensitivity was 0.76; specificity, 0.84; and positive predictive value (PPV3), 0.16. The corresponding values for mammography alone were 0.52, 0.91, and 0.38 (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Breast cancer was diagnosed in 2.6 percent of the 612 MRI participants, with a supplemental yield of 14.7 per 1,000 (P = 0.004). For MRI and mammography plus ultrasound the sensitivity was 1.00; specificity, 0.65; and PPV3, 0.19. For the participants who underwent MRI, the sensitivity of combined mammography and ultrasound was 0.44 (P = 0.004); the specificity was 0.84 (P < 0.001); and the PPV3 was 0.18 (P = 0.98). To detect one cancer, the number of screens needed was 127 for mammography; 234 for supplemental ultrasound; and 68 for MRI after negative mammography and ultrasound results.

"The addition of screening ultrasound or MRI to mammography in women at increased risk of breast cancer resulted in not only a higher cancer detection yield but also an increase in false-positive findings," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial ties to the medical device industry.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Cetuximab With Chemo Doesn't Improve Colon Cancer Outcome Next: Fluoroquinolone Use Linked to Retinal Detachment

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2013
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.