Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Opinion  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 
Category: Cardiology | Dermatology | Endocrinology | Family Medicine | Geriatrics | Gastroenterology | Gynecology | Infections | AIDS | Internal Medicine | Allergy | Critical Care | Emergency Medicine | Nephrology | Neurology | Nursing | Oncology | Ophthalmology | Orthopedics | ENT | Pediatrics | Pharmacy | Psychiatry | Pulmonology | Rheumatology | Surgery | Anesthesiology & Pain | Urology | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Methodological Heterogeneity Seen in Clinical Trials

Last Updated: May 01, 2012.

 

Trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov from 2007 to 2010 mainly small, single-center

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
Clinical studies registered with ClinicalTrials.gov from 2007 and 2010 are predominately small, single-center trials and contain significant heterogeneity in methodology, according to a study published in the May 2 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

TUESDAY, May 1 (HealthDay News) -- Clinical studies registered with ClinicalTrials.gov from 2007 and 2010 are predominately small, single-center trials and contain significant heterogeneity in methodology, according to a study published in the May 2 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Robert M. Califf, M.D., from the Duke Translational Medicine Institute in Durham, N.C., and colleagues investigated the characteristics of 96,346 clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov. Interventional trials focusing on three clinical specialties -- cardiovascular, mental health, and oncology -- were identified and analyzed.

The researchers found that the number of registered interventional clinical trials increased from 28,881 from 2004 to 2007 to 40,970 in the period from 2007 to 2010, with a concurrent decrease in the number of missing data elements. The interventional trials registered from 2007 and 2010 were mainly small (62 percent enrolled 100 or fewer participants), single-center (66 percent), and funded by organizations other than the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or industry (47 percent). Methods varied by clinical specialty, sponsor type, and the reported use of data monitoring committees (DMCs), randomization, and blinding. Use of DMCs was less common in industry-sponsored studies compared to NIH-sponsored trials (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.11), earlier-phase trials compared to phase 3 trials (adjusted OR, 0.83), and in mental health trials compared to trials in the other two specialties. Randomization and blinding in trials were less frequently reported in earlier-phase trials, oncology trials, and device trials.

"Clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov are dominated by small trials and contain significant heterogeneity in methodological approaches, including reported use of randomization, blinding, and DMCs," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Breast Brachytherapy May Not Be Best Choice in Older Women Next: In CKD, Fish Oil Doesn't Up Hemodialysis Graft Patency

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.