Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Opinion  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 
Category: Family Medicine | Nursing | Orthopedics | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Incomplete Recovery of Lumbar Discs Two Years After Bed Rest

Last Updated: June 22, 2012.

 

MRI scans show persistent increases in disc volume, disc height, intervertebral length

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
Recovery of the lumbar intervertebral discs following a 60-day period of bed rest is a lengthy process, with recovery incomplete at two years, according to a study published in the June 15 issue of Spine.

FRIDAY, June 22 (HealthDay News) -- Recovery of the lumbar intervertebral discs following a 60-day period of bed rest is a lengthy process, with recovery incomplete at two years, according to a study published in the June 15 issue of Spine.

Daniel L. Belavý, B.Phty., Ph.D., from the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and colleagues conducted a prospective longitudinal study to evaluate the recovery of the lumbar intervertebral discs after bed rest. As part of the second Berlin BedRest Study, 24 male participants completed 60 days of head down tilt bed rest. Of these, 22 underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 180 days and 21 at two years after bed rest.

The researchers found that increases in disc volume and height and intervertebral length persisted at 180 days (P ≤ 0.0004) and 720 days (P ≤ 0.024) after bed rest, compared with prior to bed rest. At 180 days the disc signal intensity remained increased (P = 0.034), but at two years it was decreased compared with baseline (P = 0.018).

"The current study shows that the recovery of the morphology of the lumbar intervertebral discs after prolonged bed rest is incomplete after two years," the authors write. "Further work is required to examine whether these persistent effects could be associated with increased disc injury risk."

The second Berlin BedRest Study was partially funded by the pharmaceutical and medical device industries.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Reduced Efficacy for CRC Screenings Done by Non-GI Docs Next: Telehealth Intervention Linked to Lower Admission Rates

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.