Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Opinion  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 
Category: Cardiology | Family Medicine | Internal Medicine | Emergency Medicine | Nursing | Radiology | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Coronary CT Angiography in ER Ups Decision-Making Efficiency

Last Updated: July 25, 2012.

 

CCTA reduces length of stay for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome symptoms

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
Incorporating coronary computed tomographic angiography into evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute coronary syndrome symptoms improves the efficacy of clinical decision making, according to a study published in the July 26 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

WEDNESDAY, July 25 (HealthDay News) -- Incorporating coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) into evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute coronary syndrome symptoms improves the efficacy of clinical decision making, according to a study published in the July 26 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Udo Hoffmann, M.D., M.P.H., from the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and colleagues conducted a multicenter trial in which patients aged 40 to 74 years with symptoms of acute coronary syndromes, without ischemic electrocardiographic changes or an initial positive troponin test, were randomized to early CCTA or to standard evaluation in the emergency department on weekdays during daylight hours.

The researchers found that, compared with standard evaluation, after early CCTA the mean length of stay in the hospital was reduced significantly, by 7.6 hours, and significantly more patients were discharged directly from the emergency department (47 versus 12 percent). There were no significant differences in major adverse cardiovascular events at 28 days between the groups and there were no undetected acute coronary syndromes. More downstream testing and higher radiation exposure was noted after CCTA. The cumulative mean cost of care was similar between the two groups ($4,289 for CCTA and $4,060 for standard evaluation; P = 0.65).

"In patients in the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndromes, incorporating CCTA into a triage strategy improved the efficiency of clinical decision making, as compared with a standard evaluation in the emergency department, but it resulted in an increase in downstream testing and radiation exposure with no decrease in the overall costs of care," the authors conclude.

Several of the authors disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Wives of Patients With Severe Sepsis at Risk for Depression Next: Study Assesses Cardio Risk Factors in Severely Obese Children

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.