Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Blogs  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 

 Headlines:

 

Category: Cardiology | Internal Medicine | Critical Care | Emergency Medicine | Nursing | Geriatrics | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Multiple Factors Motivate No Reperfusion in STEMI

Last Updated: August 02, 2012.

 

Three or more reasons for most not receiving reperfusion; outcomes poor in this population

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
For patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the decision for no reperfusion is usually multifactorial, with the most common factor being advanced age, according to a study published in the Aug. 15 issue of The American Journal of Cardiology.

THURSDAY, Aug. 2 (HealthDay News) -- For patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the decision for no reperfusion is usually multifactorial, with the most common factor being advanced age, according to a study published in the Aug. 15 issue of The American Journal of Cardiology.

To examine the reasons underlying the decision not to give reperfusion in patients with STEMI and the outcomes for these patients, Frances O. Wood, M.D., from William Beaumont Hospital in Royal Oak, Mich., and colleagues identified 139 patients (mean age, 80 years; 61 percent women, 31 percent with diabetes, and 37 percent with known coronary artery disease) from a total of 1,126 patients with STEMI who did not undergo reperfusion therapy at a high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention center, from October 2006 to March 2011.

The researchers found that 52 percent of the 139 patients presented with primary diagnoses other than STEMI, and 28 percent developed STEMI more than 24 hours after admission. Advanced age, comorbid conditions, acute or chronic kidney injury, delayed presentation, advance directives precluding reperfusion, patient preference, and dementia were the most common reasons for no reperfusion. Sixty percent of the patients had three or more reasons for no reperfusion. Cardiogenic shock, intubation, and advance directives prohibiting reperfusion after physician consultation were associated with hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality was 53 percent and one-year mortality was 69 percent.

"The decision for no reperfusion was multifactorial, with advanced age reported as the most common factor," the authors write. "Outcomes were poor in this population, and fewer than half of these patients survived to hospital discharge."

One author disclosed financial ties to pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Cellular Mechanisms of HIV-1 Dissemination Elucidated Next: High-Cost Imaging of Advanced Cancer Patients Increasing

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.