Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Blogs  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 
Category: Gynecology | Oncology | Pharmacy | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Subcutaneous, IV Trastuzumab Comparable for Breast Cancer

Last Updated: August 09, 2012.

 

Subcutaneous trastuzumab non-inferior to IV formulation for HER2-positive early breast cancer

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
For human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive early breast cancer, a subcutaneous formulation of trastuzumab is non-inferior to the standard intravenous formulation, according to a study published online Aug. 9 in The Lancet Oncology.

THURSDAY, Aug. 9 (HealthDay News) -- For human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer, a subcutaneous formulation of trastuzumab is non-inferior to the standard intravenous formulation, according to a study published online Aug. 9 in The Lancet Oncology.

Gustavo Ismael, M.D., from the Hospital Amaral Carvalho in Jaú, Brazil, and colleagues conducted a phase 3, randomized, open-label trial to compare the pharmacokinetic profile, efficacy, and safety of the subcutaneous and intravenous formulations of trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer. Participants with HER2-positive, operable, locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer were randomized to neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered concurrently with either intravenous trastuzumab (299 patients; 8 mg/kg loading dose and 6 mg/kg maintenance dose given every three weeks) or subcutaneous trastuzumab (297 patients; fixed dose of 600 mg given every three weeks). Patients continued with trastuzumab after surgery to complete one year of treatment.

The researchers found that, in the intravenous and subcutaneous groups, the geometric mean presurgery serum trough concentration (Ctrough) was 51.8 and 69.0 µg/mL, respectively, for a ratio of Ctrough subcutaneous to Ctrough intravenous of 1.33. A pathologic complete response was achieved by 40.7 and 45.4 percent in the intravenous and subcutaneous groups, respectively. Subcutaneous trastuzumab was considered non-inferior to intravenous trastuzumab. The incidence of grade 3 to 5 adverse events was comparable between the groups, with more patients in the subcutaneous group experiencing serious adverse events than in the intravenous group (21 versus 12 percent). There were two treatment-related deaths in the subcutaneous group.

"Subcutaneous trastuzumab, administered over about five minutes, has a pharmacokinetic profile and efficacy non-inferior to standard intravenous administration, with a similar safety profile to intravenous trastuzumab, and therefore offers a valid treatment alternative," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial ties to F. Hoffmann-La Roche, which funded the study and manufactures trastuzumab.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: CDC: Increase in Prevalence of Walking in the United States Next: Psyllium Reduces Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     
net

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.