Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Blogs  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 

 Headlines:

 

Category: Oncology | ENT | Pathology | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Prognostic Factors Identified in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

Last Updated: August 10, 2012.

 

Better outcome for low-, intermediate-grade; poor prognosis for advanced stage, perineural invasion

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
Diagnosis of low- or intermediate-grade tumors is associated with significantly better overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands, while advanced disease stage and perineural invasion are the most significant indicators of poor prognosis, according to a study published in the Aug. 15 issue of Cancer.

FRIDAY, Aug. 10 (HealthDay News) -- Diagnosis of low- or intermediate-grade tumors is associated with significantly better overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the salivary glands, while advanced disease stage and perineural invasion are the most significant indicators of poor prognosis, according to a study published in the Aug. 15 issue of Cancer.

Catherine H. McHugh, M.D., from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and colleagues retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 125 patients with salivary gland MEC from 1990 to 2007.

The researchers found that, for all patients, the five-year overall survival was 79.3 percent and the disease-free survival was 76.5 percent. Low- and intermediate-grade disease correlated with significantly better overall and disease-free survival than high-grade disease, with no difference noted in survival rates between low- and intermediate-grade disease. Indicators of poor prognosis included pathologic results of positive lymph nodes, extracapsular lymph node spread, and perineural invasion. Advanced disease stage and perineural invasion were found to be the most significant prognostic factors on multivariate analysis.

"High histological grade, advanced stage, perineural invasion, positive surgical margins, and submandibular location all portend for unfavorable outcomes among patients with MEC," the authors write. "These factors should therefore be taken into consideration when establishing the aggressiveness of a treatment strategy."

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Statin Benefits Outweigh Risk of Developing Diabetes Next: Reasons for Discontinuation Vary by Psoriasis Treatment

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.