Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Blogs  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 

 Headlines:

 

Category: Dermatology | Surgery | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

New Classification of Fat Grafting Techniques Proposed

Last Updated: September 07, 2012.

 

Need to match the fat grafting technique to plastic surgery situation for best results

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
As the use of fat grafting in plastic surgery continues to evolve, a new way of classifying fat grafting techniques has been proposed that aims to match the technique to the specific clinical situation, according to research published in the September issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

FRIDAY, Sept. 7 (HealthDay News) -- As the use of fat grafting in plastic surgery continues to evolve, a new way of classifying fat grafting techniques has been proposed that aims to match the technique to the specific clinical situation, according to research published in the September issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Daniel Del Vecchio, M.D., M.B.A., of Back Bay Plastic Surgery in Boston, and Rod J. Rohrich, M.D., of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, reported results from four patient cases involving different fat grafting techniques to compare methods of harvesting, cell processing, transplantation, and management of the recipient site.

The researchers found that cases involving fat grafting included facial volume correction; treatment of a chronic wound of the lower extremity; primary core volume breast augmentation using the large-syringe technique; and core volume breast reconstruction in irradiated and nonirradiated mastectomy sites using pre- and postoperative expansion, large-syringe technique, and three-dimensional parenchymal release. Overall, the authors found that the key clinical factors included the volume demands of the recipient site and whether the recipient site was healthy or pathologic tissue. Additionally, small- versus large-volume and regenerative versus nonregenerative features also played a role.

"Thirty years after the inception of lipoaspirate injection, autologous fat transplantation has evolved from an underrated, oversimplified procedure to at least four different strategies that take into account harvesting technique, lobular size, processing of the graft, injection technique, and the specific requirements of the recipient site," the authors write.

Full Text

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Disengaged Preschoolers at Academic Risk Next: Antibody Titer Prognostic in Membranous Nephropathy

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.