Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Blogs  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 

 Headlines:

 

Category: Dermatology | Internal Medicine | Oncology | Pathology | Radiology | Surgery | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

SPECT/CT Associated With Improved Survival in Melanoma

Last Updated: September 11, 2012.

 

SPECT/CT-aided sentinel lymph node excision improves detection of metastases, outcome

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
For patients with clinically lymph node-negative melanoma, the use of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography to aid sentinel lymph node excision is associated with increased detection of metastatic involvement and improved disease-free survival, compared with standard sentinel lymph node excision, according to a study published in the Sept. 12 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

TUESDAY, Sept. 11 (HealthDay News) -- For patients with clinically lymph node-negative melanoma, the use of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to aid sentinel lymph node excision (SLNE) is associated with increased detection of metastatic involvement and improved disease-free survival, compared with standard SLNE, according to a study published in the Sept. 12 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Ingo Stoffels, M.D., from the University of Essen-Duisburg in Germany, and colleagues compared metastatic node detection and disease-free survival using SPECT/CT-aided SLNE versus standard SLNE in a cohort of 403 patients with melanoma with clinically negative lymph nodes.

A total of 254 patients underwent the standard SLNE technique and 149 underwent SPECT/CT-aided SLNE. The researchers found that use of SPECT/CT allowed SLNE more frequently in the head and neck area (2.0 percent for standard versus 23.5 percent for SPECT/CT; P < 0.001). More sentinel lymph nodes per patient were detected in the SPECT/CT cohort than in the standard cohort (2.40 versus 1.87; P < 0.001), and the number of positive sentinel lymph nodes per patient was significantly higher (0.34 versus 0.21; P = 0.04). In the SPECT/CT cohort, the local relapse rate was significantly lower (6.8 versus 23.8 percent; P = 0.03) and four-year disease-free survival was significantly higher (93.9 versus 79.2 percent; P = 0.02), compared to the standard cohort.

"Among patients with clinically lymph node-negative melanoma, the use of SPECT/CT-aided SLNE compared with SLNE alone was associated with a higher frequency of metastatic involvement and a higher rate of disease-free survival," the authors write.

One author disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Less Alzheimer's Pathology With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use Next: No Superior Method of Adjusting Inhaled Steroids in Asthma

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.