Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Opinion  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 
Category: Family Medicine | Pediatrics | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Negative Effects Noted for 2011 ACGME Requirements

Last Updated: October 08, 2013.

 

Second study raises questions relating to patient safety and educational quality

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
Pediatric program directors report negative effects of the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Common Program Requirements, raising questions relating to patient safety and education quality, according to a study and editorial published online Oct. 7 in Pediatrics.

TUESDAY, Oct. 8 (HealthDay News) -- Pediatric program directors report negative effects of the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Common Program Requirements, raising questions relating to patient safety and education quality, according to a study and editorial published online Oct. 7 in Pediatrics.

Brian C. Drolet, M.D., from Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University in Providence, R.I., and colleagues surveyed 151 pediatric program directors to examine approval and perception of changes to resident training and patient care resulting from 2011 ACGME Common Program Requirements. The researchers found that program directors reported approval for almost all ACGME duty hour regulations, with the exception of 16-hour intern shift limits (72.2 percent disapproval). With respect to the impact of new standards, many areas were unchanged, while negative effects were reported by most program directors on resident education, preparation for senior roles, resident ownership of patients, and continuity of care.

Kenneth B. Roberts, M.D., from Cone Health in Greensboro, N.C., discusses the negativity reported by program directors relating to the 2011 ACGME requirements. The researcher raised four questions, the first related to the correlation between patient safety and education, examining whether the shift in decision-making from interns to more senior residents was positive. The other issues related to the relationship between supervision and education, education and quality of life, and measurements of education quality.

"In this era of evidence-based medicine, the impact of changes on outcomes such as patient safety and quality of education need to be assessed rigorously: clearly the most important conclusion of the Drolet et al article," Roberts writes.

Abstract - Drolet
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2013 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Previous: Patient Satisfaction Is Poor Measure of Hospital Quality Next: Confusion Still Surrounds ACA Health Insurance Exchanges

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2014
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.