Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

 
 
News  |  Journals  |  Conferences  |  Blogs  |  Articles  |  Forums  |  Twitter    
 

 Headlines:

 

Category: Cardiology | Dermatology | Endocrinology | Family Medicine | Gastroenterology | Gynecology | Infections | AIDS | Internal Medicine | Allergy | Critical Care | Emergency Medicine | Nephrology | Neurology | Nursing | Oncology | Ophthalmology | Orthopedics | ENT | Pathology | Pediatrics | Psychiatry | Pulmonology | Radiology | Rheumatology | Surgery | Urology | Journal

Back to Journal Articles

Study Finds Costs of Quality Programs Burden Practices

Last Updated: November 11, 2009.

 

Another study finds many clinical trials change study design outcomes without explanation

Share |

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

 

  Related
 
The cost of providing data and support for health system quality-improvement programs can put a significant burden on primary care practices, and changes in the outcomes of trials are often made without being disclosed, according to two studies in the November/December Annals of Family Medicine.

WEDNESDAY, Nov. 11 (HealthDay News) -- The cost of providing data and support for health system quality-improvement programs can put a significant burden on primary care practices, and changes in the outcomes of trials are often made without being disclosed, according to two studies in the November/December Annals of Family Medicine.

Jacqueline R. Halladay, M.D., of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and colleagues collected information from eight diverse primary care practices in North Carolina on the costs of participating in four quality-reporting programs. The researchers found that costs to the practices in personnel time, training, registry maintenance, and other program components ranged from less than $1,000 to $11,100 during program implementation and from less than $100 to $4,300 annually.

In the other study, Robert Ewart, M.D., of the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine in Springfield, and colleagues examined the frequency of changes without explanation in clinical trial primary and secondary outcomes. They compared randomized clinical trials from consecutive issues of five medical journals over a six-month period against their respective trial registry entries and found that in 31 percent of trials a primary outcome was changed, and in 70 percent a secondary outcome was changed.

"There are substantial and important undisclosed changes made to the outcomes of published randomized controlled trials between trial registration and publication. This finding has important implications for the interpretation of trial results. Disclosure and discussion of changes would improve transparency in the performance and reporting of trials," Ewart and colleagues conclude.

Abstract - Halladay
Full Text
Abstract - Ewart
Full Text

Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.


Previous: Muscle Strength May Lower Alzheimer's Disease Risk Next: Increased Cancer Recurrence Linked to High Breast Density

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)
 

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

 
     

 advertisement.gif (61x7 -- 0 bytes)

 

 

Useful Sites
MediLexicon
  Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us
Copyright © 2001-2013
Doctors Lounge.
All rights reserved.

Medical Reference:
Diseases | Symptoms
Drugs | Labs | Procedures
Software | Tutorials

Advertising
Links | Humor
Forum Archive
CME | Conferences

Privacy Statement
Terms & Conditions
Editorial Board
About us | Email

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.