|
Headlines:
|
 |
Back to Oncology Articles
Friday April 23, 2004 1:15 PM GMT
|
|
|
Patients who underwent routine follow up with the tumor marker
and CT scan enjoyed a longer survival.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follow up of stage II and stage III colorectal cancer patients with
tumor marker and CAT scan is beneficial, according to a new study.
In a study published in this week's Journal of Clinical Oncology,
researchers from the Royal Marsden Hospital in the UK concluded
that patients who underwent routine follow up with the tumor marker, CEA
and CT scan of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis enjoyed a longer survival.
Patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer are treated
surgically. Once their tumor is removed some of these patients receive
additional protective chemotherapy in order to improve their survival.
These patients are then followed up for the next 5 years usually
every 3 to 4 months. Follow up includes careful history taking and
examination in addition to requesting a tumor marker called CEA (carcinoembryonic
antigen), a serum glycoprotein, which is elevated in some patients with recurrent or
progressing colon cancer. A CT scan or even a colonoscopy may be requested if
the physician feels suspicious of any symptoms or signs the patient may
have.
Until now the rationale for performing these investigations routinely
was not based on sound evidence. Some even argued that cost of
performing these investigations routinely was not warranted.

|
|
|
|
Are you a doctor or a nurse?
Do you want to join the Doctors Lounge online medical community?
Participate in editorial activities (publish, peer review, edit) and
give a helping hand to the largest online community of patients.
Click on the link below to see the requirements:
Doctors Lounge Membership
Application |
|
Study details
The study which was performed between 1993 and 1999, included 530
patients with resected stage II and III colorectal cancer. Patients were
randomly assigned to bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin or protracted venous
infusion fluorouracil. The median follow-up was 5.6 years.
Patients were divided into groups and disease relapse was detected
either by symptoms, CEA, CT, and others. Fourteen patients, whose relapses were
detected by CT, had a concomitant elevation of CEA and were included in
both groups. The CT-detected group had a better survival compared with
the symptomatic group from the time of relapse. 20% of these patients proceeded to potentially curative surgery for relapse and
enjoyed a better survival than those who did not. CEA was measured at each clinic visit, and CT of thorax, abdomen, and
pelvis was performed at 12 and 24 months after commencement of
chemotherapy.
The presence of elevated levels of CEA in colorectal cancer patients
prior to surgery has been established in previous studies as a sign of
poor prognosis. In detecting colon cancer CEA has a sensitivity of 47%
and a specificity of 90%.
References:
Ian Chau, Mark J. Allen, David Cunningham, Andrew R. Norman, Gina
Brown, Hugo E.R. Ford, Niall Tebbutt, Diana Tait, Mark Hill, Paul J.
Ross, Jacqui Oates. The Value of Routine Serum Carcino-Embryonic Antigen
Measurement and Computed Tomography in the Surveillance of Patients
After Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Clinical
Oncology, Vol 22, No 8 (April 15), 2004: pp. 1420-1429.
| Article reviewed by: |
Dr. Tamer Fouad, M.D.
|
|
|
|
|