| |
|
Headlines:
|
 |
Back to Oncology Articles
|
FDA ALERT [6/2005]:
FDA has approved new labeling for gefitinib (Iressa)
that limits the indication to cancer patients who, in the
opinion of their treating physician, are currently
benefiting, or have previously benefited, from Iressa
treatment. AstraZeneca plans to limit distribution of this
drug under a risk management plan called the Iressa Access
Program.
This
information reflects FDA?s preliminary analysis of data
concerning this drug. FDA is considering, but has not
reached a final conclusion about, this information. FDA
intends to update this sheet when additional information or
analyses become available. |
Monday May 19, 2003 7:15 PM GMT
|
|
|
Gefitinib is the first oral drug approved in the United States for the
treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The FDA approved gefitinib (trade name Iressa?, manufactured by AstraZeneca)
for the treatment of advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer after prior
treatment with both platinum-based and Docetaxel (trade name Taxotere?,
manufactured by Aventis) chemotherapy. This approval was made public
on May 5th, 2003. The recommended treatment with Iressa (gefitinib) is a 250
mg as one pill each day until lung cancer progression or unacceptable toxicity
from the drug. Iressa (gefitinib) is manufactured as a 250 mg pill.
Iressa (gefitinib) is the first oral drug approved in the United States for the
treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. It is a novel small molecule
that inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of the epidermal growth factor
receptor (EGFR). EGFR activity via tyrosine kinase is involved in
cancer cell activity and growth.
There have been two Phase 2 clinical trials that have studied the use
of Iressa (gefitinib) in advanced-stage
non-small cell lung cancer: IDEAL-1
and IDEAl-2 (international and U.S. studies, respectively). IDEAL-1
enrolled patients who had received at least one prior chemotherapy regimen
(platinum-based) and had disease progression. IDEAL-2 enrolled the
same population, except that patients had received at least two
prior chemotherapy
regimens (platinum-based and Docetaxel). Both clinical trials were presented
at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting held last year
(abstract #1188 for IDEAL-1 and abstract #1166 for Ideal-2).

|
|
|
|
Are you a doctor or a nurse?
Do you want to join the Doctors Lounge online medical community?
Participate in editorial activities (publish, peer review, edit) and
give a helping hand to the largest online community of patients.
Click on the link below to see the requirements:
Doctors Lounge Membership
Application |
|
In both clinical trials, patients received Iressa (gefitinib) at a dose of either
250 mg each day or 500 mg each day. Treatment was continued until
disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient death. Table
1 below outlines information about these two clinical studies.
Table 1
|
|
IDEAL-1
|
|
IDEAL-2
|
|
250
mg
|
500
mg
|
250
mg
|
500
mg
|
|
|
|
|
# of patients
|
104
|
100
|
102
|
114
|
|
Median age
|
61 years
|
60 years
|
61 years
|
62 years
|
|
Male patients
|
75%
|
66%
|
59%
|
55%
|
|
Performance status 0-1 / 2
|
87% /
13%
|
87% /
13%
|
81% /
19%
|
79% /
21%
|
|
Adenocarcinoma
|
64%
|
67%
|
69%
|
64%
|
|
Partial response
|
18%
|
19%
|
12%
|
9%
|
|
Stable disease
|
36%
|
32%
|
31%
|
27%
|
|
Overall disease control rate
|
54%
|
51%
|
43%
|
36%
|
|
Median duration of response
|
98 days
|
140 days
|
|
|
|
Progression free survival
|
2.7 months
|
2.8 months
|
1.9 months
|
|
|
Overall survival
|
7.6 months
|
8.1 months
|
6.5 months
|
5.9 months
|
|
Symptom improvement
|
40%
|
37%
|
43%
|
35%
|
|
Median time to achieve symptom improvement
|
8 days
|
14 days
|
|
Rash (grade 3/4)
|
1%
|
7%
|
0%
|
5%
|
|
Diarrhea (grade 3/4)
|
0%
|
7%
|
1%
|
6%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data presented about subgroup analyses indicated that
adenocarcinoma pathology favored a better response to Iressa (gefitinib) compared
to squamous cell pathology. Bronchioalveolar pathology also appeared
to respond well. These subgroup analyses are of small numbers and
statistical comparisons could not be performed.
No differences in treatment outcomes were noted among
patients who have received one or more
prior chemotherapy regimens.
Likewise, no differences in treatment outcomes were noted for patients with
good or poor performance statuses. No differences in outcomes were
noted between the two different Iressa (gefitinib) doses.
The achievement of a symptom improvement was correlated
with the achievement of disease response. In the IDEAL-1 trial, 69%
of patients receiving Iressa (gefitinib) 250 mg had symptom improvement if they had
a partial tumor response, whereas only 40% and 12% did if they had stable
disease or progressive disease, respectively. In the IDEAL-2 trial,
100% of patients receiving Iressa (gefitinib) 250 mg had symptom improvement if they
had a partial tumor response, whereas only 81% and 12% did if they had stable
disease or progressive disease, respectively. In the IDEAL-1 trial,
if symptom improvement occurred, then the median survival was better than
if no symptom improvement occurred (not reached versus 3.5 months, respectively.
In the IDEAL-2 trial, if symptom improvement occurred, then the median survival
was also noted to be better than if no such improvement occurred (not reached
versus 3.7 months, respectively).
The majority of toxicities were of a mild nature (i.e.-
grade 1 or 2). Common toxicities included skin reactions (rash, acne,
pruritis), changes in the liver laboratory tests,
diarrhea (which can cause
dehydration), nausea, and vomiting. No treatment-related deaths were
reported initially in the IDEAL-1 trial and only one treatment-related death
was reported in the IDEAL-2 trial. Recent reports from Japan have
indicated approximately 200 cases of deaths among patients receiving
Iressa (gefitinib).
Interstitial lung disease was the problem encountered in these cases and
appeared to occur at an incidence of 1-2%. Approximately 1/3 of such
cases were fatal. Interstitial lung disease presented as respiratory
difficulties,
cough, and fever without overt clinical evidence of infection.
In such cases, prompt discontinuation of Iressa (gefitinib) and the application of
supportive measures are recommended.
Two large randomized clinical trials were reported
at last year?s ESMO meeting in Europe: INTACT-1 and INTACT-2. These
trials randomized patients to a
standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimen
or to the same chemotherapy regimen with the addition of Iressa (gefitinib).
The study results, in both trials, did not show any benefit from the addition
of Iressa (gefitinib) to first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced-stage
non-small cell lung cancer.
More detailed information about Iressa (gefitinib), including
the results of the above mentioned clinical trials and prescribing information,
is available at the FDA?s web site:
http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/iressa/default.htm
|
|