| |
|
Headlines:
|
 |
Back to index
AC regimen
| |
Breast Cancer News |
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Breast Cancer |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Abstract: Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without
interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide,
methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with
tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant
Breast and Bowel Project B-15.
The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) implemented
protocol B-15 to compare 2 months of Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories,
Columbus, OH) and cyclophosphamide (AC) with 6 months of conventional cyclophosphamide,
methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in patients with breast cancer nonresponsive
to tamoxifen (TAM, T). A second aim was to determine whether AC followed
in 6 months by intravenous (IV) CMF was more effective than AC without reinduction
therapy. Through 3 years of follow-up, findings from 2,194 patients indicate
no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS, P = .5), distant
disease-free survival (DDFS, P = .5) or survival (S, P = .8) among the three
groups. Since the outcome from AC and CMF was almost identical, the issue
arises concerning which regimen is more appropriate for the treatment of
breast cancer patients. AC seems preferable since, following total mastectomy,
AC was completed on day 63 versus day 154 for conventional CMF; patients
visited health professionals three times as often for conventional CMF as
for AC; women on AC received therapy on each of 4 days versus on each of
84 days for conventional CMF; and nausea-control medication was given for
about 84 days to conventional CMF patients versus for about 12 days to patients
on AC. The difference in the amount of alopecia between the two treatment
groups was less than anticipated. While alopecia was almost universally
observed following AC therapy, 71% of the CMF patients also had hair loss
and, in 41%, the loss was greater than 50%. This study and NSABP B-16, which
evaluates the worth of AC therapy in TAM-responsive patients, indicate the
merit of 2 months of AC therapy for all positive-node breast cancer patients.
References
Fisher B, Brown AM, Dimitrov NV, Poisson R, Redmond C, Margolese RG, Bowman
D, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Kardinal CG, et al. Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide
with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of
cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast
cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National
Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15. J Clin Oncol.
1990 Sep;8(9):1483-96.

|
|
|
|
Are you a doctor or a nurse?
Do you want to join the Doctors Lounge online medical community?
Participate in editorial activities (publish, peer review, edit) and
give a helping hand to the largest online community of patients.
Click on the link below to see the requirements:
Doctors Lounge Membership
Application |
|
| Regimen |
|
Adriamycin...... 60 mg/sqm IV
day 1.
Cytoxan......... 600 mg/sqm IV day 1.
FREQUENCY....... Repeat cycle every 21 days. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Summary |
Adjuvant
AC vs AC+CMF vs CMF |
| |
Disease Free
Survival @ 3 years |
No difference |
| |
Toxicity |
Alopecia
was observed more in the AC group |
| |
|
|
|
|