| |
|
Headlines:
|
 |
Back to index
CMF regimen
| |
Breast Cancer News |
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Breast Cancer |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Abstract: Randomized trial to compare the
efficacy and toxicity of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil
(CMF) with methotrexate mitoxantrone (MM) in advanced carcinoma of the breast.
One hundred and sixteen patients
with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive
CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg m-2 day 1 and 8 i.v., 5-fluorouracil 600 mg
m-2 day 1 and 8 i.v.,, methotrexate 40 mg m-2 day 1 and 8 i.v., monthly
for 6 cycles) or MM (methotrexate 30 mg m-2, mitoxantrone 6.5 mg m-2, both
i.v. day 1 3-weekly for 8 cycles) as first line treatment with chemotherapy.
Objective responses occurred in 17 patients out of 58 (29%) who received
CMF and nine out of 58 (15%) who received MM; 95% confidence interval for
difference in response rates (-1%-29%), P = 0.07. No statistically significant
differences were seen in overall survival or time to progression between
the two regimes although a tendency towards a shorter progression time on
the MM regime must be acknowledged. There was, however, significantly reduced
haematological toxicity (P < 0.001) and alopecia (P < 0.001) and fewer dose
reductions and delays in patients randomized to MM. No statistically significant
differences were seen between the two regimes in terms of quality of life
(QOL). However, some association between QOL and toxicity was apparent overall
with pooled QOL estimates tending to indicate a worsening in psychological
state with increasing maximum toxicity over treatment. Despite the fact
that results surrounding response rates and time to progression did not
reach statistical significance, their possible compatibility with an improved
outcome on CMF treatment must be borne in mind. However, MM is a well-tolerated
regimen with fewer side-effects than CMF, which with careful patient management
and follow-up, therefore, may merit consideration as a first-line treatment
to palliate patients with metastatic breast cancer who are infirm or elderly.
References
C Harper-Wynne, J English,
L Meyer, M Bower, C Archer,
H D Sinnett, C Lowdell and R C Coombes.
Randomized trial to compare the efficacy and
toxicity of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with
methotrexate mitoxantrone (MM) in advanced carcinoma of the breast.
British Journal of Cancer (1999)
81, 316-322.

|
|
|
|
Are you a doctor or a nurse?
Do you want to join the Doctors Lounge online medical community?
Participate in editorial activities (publish, peer review, edit) and
give a helping hand to the largest online community of patients.
Click on the link below to see the requirements:
Doctors Lounge Membership
Application |
|
| Regimen |
|
Cyclophosphamide....... 600
mg / M2 IV days 1, 8
Methotrexate....... 40 mg / M2 IV days 1, 8
5 - FU....... 600 mg / M2 IV days 1, 8
FREQUENCY.......every 28 days. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Summary |
CMF d28
regimen vs MM in metastatic breast cancer |
| |
Objective
Response rate |
29% vs. 15% |
| |
Overall survival |
No difference |
| |
Time to progression |
No difference |
| |
Toxicity |
Significantly
reduced haematological toxicity and alopecia and fewer dose reductions
and delays in patients randomized to MM. |
| |
|
|
|
|