Create Account | Sign In: Author or Forum

Search Symptoms

Category: Cardiology | Family Medicine | Geriatrics | Internal Medicine | Critical Care | Emergency Medicine | Nursing | Pulmonology | Institutional

Back to Journal Articles

USPSTF: Evidence Lacking for Nontraditional CVD Risk Factors

Last Updated: January 16, 2018.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has concluded that current evidence is insufficient to assess the use of nontraditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease risk assessment. They also conclude that evidence is lacking for the use of the ankle-brachial index to screen for peripheral arterial disease in asymptomatic individuals. These findings form the basis of two draft recommendation statements published online Jan. 16 by the USPSTF.

TUESDAY, Jan. 16, 2018 (HealthDay News) -- The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has concluded that current evidence is insufficient to assess the use of nontraditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. They also conclude that evidence is lacking for the use of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) to screen for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in asymptomatic individuals. These findings form the basis of two draft recommendation statements published online Jan. 16 by the USPSTF.

Jennifer S. Lin, M.D., from the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research in Portland, Ore., and colleagues reviewed use of ABI, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and coronary artery calcium score in asymptomatic adults. The authors found that there was adequate evidence for the benefit of adding these factors to existing CVD risk assessment models; however, the evidence was inadequate for assessing treatment decision-making guided by these scores. Based on these findings, the USPSTF concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of harms and benefits of adding these scores to traditional risk assessment.

Janelle M. Guirguis-Blake, M.D., also from the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, and colleagues conducted a systematic review relating to ABI screening for PAD and CVD. The researchers found that ABI is an accurate test for detecting PAD in symptomatic patients, but few data were available on the accuracy of ABI for identifying asymptomatic individuals who could benefit from treatment. Based on these findings, the USPSTF concluded that the current evidence is insufficient for assessing the balance of benefits and harms associated with PAD and CVD risk screening with ABI.

These findings form the basis of two draft recommendation statements, which are available for public comment from Jan. 16 through Feb. 12, 2018.

Evidence Review - CVD
Draft Recommendation Statement - CVD
Comment on Recommendation Statement - CVD
Evidence Review - PAD
Draft Recommendation Statement - PAD
Comment on Recommendation Statement - PAD


Previous: Reduced All-Cause Mortality for Obese Patients After Bariatric Sx Next: Room for Improvement Seen With Initial Diabetes Care

Reader comments on this article are listed below. Review our comments policy.


Submit your opinion: