Medical Specialty >> Urology

Doctors Lounge - Urology Answers

Back to Urology Answers List

If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately. Doctors Lounge ( does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned on the Site.

DISCLAIMER: The information provided on is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Please read our 'Terms and Conditions of Use' carefully before using this site.

Date of last update: 8/13/2017.

Forum Name: Urology Topics

Question: Ultrasound Shows BB-Sized Mass In Testicle

 triflyr - Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:03 pm

Hello, I am a 46 year old male new to this website and am looking for more advice. I saw my Urologist today for a follow-up from last week when I went in due to the epidydimus on my right testicle being inflamed. He didn't think it was inflamed much and didn't find anything on my testicle during his exam. As a precaution, he went ahead and sent me for an ultrasound. The imaging report indicated that there appeared to be a bb-sized mass inside the testicle. He doesn't want me to do anything but a self examination once a month for the next three months and then go back for another ultrasound. Is this sound advice? If this is a cancer, isn't there some other way to find out sooner rather than wait around for it to grow or possibly spread? Thanks for your help. I am very worried.
 Dr.M.Aroon kamath - Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:53 am

User avatar Hi,
High orchidectomy (radical orchidectomy) has remained the preferred treatment option for testicular masses.

With the increasing use of high-frequency scrotal ultrasonography in assessment of male infertility, non-palpable, small, incidentally discovered testicular lesions is on the increase.What is the best way of dealing with them has remained controversial.

There have been studies in which small incidental non-palpable testicular masses were safely followed with serial ultrasound and did not show significant increase in growth warranting surgery.

Especially, non-palpable testicular masses less than 1 cm on ultrasound seemed to be amenable to ultrasound surveillance supplemented by clinical monitoring. Surgery is advised if the patient cannot continue surveillance, or if the lesion shows rapid growth consistent with a malignancy, or if tumor markers are positive.

This method is not widely practiced but, is an option that is undergoing trials & surveillance seems to show initial promise as a viable option.

Best wishes!

| Check a doctor's response to similar questions

Are you a Doctor, Pharmacist, PA or a Nurse?

Join the Doctors Lounge online medical community

  • Editorial activities: Publish, peer review, edit online articles.

  • Ask a Doctor Teams: Respond to patient questions and discuss challenging presentations with other members.

Doctors Lounge Membership Application

Tools & Services: Follow DoctorsLounge on Twitter Follow us on Twitter | RSS News | Newsletter | Contact us